From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Toor

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 2, 2021
1:20-cv-01078-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01078-AWI-SKO (PC)

07-02-2021

DEONRAY STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. K. TOOR, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION

(DOC. NO. 12)

Plaintiff Deonray Stanley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 8, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order, finding that plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Doc. No. 9. The magistrate judge granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint. Id. at 6. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the screening order.

Therefore, on April 22, 2021, the magistrate judge issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Doc. No. 10. The judge cautioned plaintiff that “[f]ailure to comply with this order w[ould] result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and to obey court orders.” Id. at 2. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause.

Accordingly, on June 3, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed for plaintiffs failure to state a claim and to obey court orders. Doc. No. 12. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and provided him 14 days to file objections thereto. Id at 2. Plaintiff has not filed any objections, and the time do so has passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 3, 2021 (Doc. No. 12) are ADOPTED in full;
2. This action is DISMISSED for plaintiff s failure to obey court orders and to state a claim on which relief can be granted; and,
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stanley v. Toor

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 2, 2021
1:20-cv-01078-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Stanley v. Toor

Case Details

Full title:DEONRAY STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. K. TOOR, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01078-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)