From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 14, 1989
538 So. 2d 1390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-544.

March 14, 1989.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Norman S. Gerstein, Judge.

George T. Yoss, Arthur Joel Berger, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Debora J. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


None of the grounds asserted by the defendant for reversal of his conviction present either error or harm. See M.H. v. State, 538 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We remand the cause, however, to the trial court for the purposes (a) of correcting the judgment so as accurately to reflect the offense of which the appellant was found guilty and (b) of making the required written findings in support of the determination that Stanley is an habitual offender. See Link v. State, 537 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).


Summaries of

Stanley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 14, 1989
538 So. 2d 1390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Stanley v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY T. STANLEY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 14, 1989

Citations

538 So. 2d 1390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

Because it was assessed for the third degree felony of theft of a motor vehicle, however, the term is…