Opinion
Civil Action 23-4571
08-06-2024
JOHN STANLEY v. PAUL G. LITTLE, et al.
ORDER
Juan R. Sanchez, J.
AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2024, upon consideration of the pending motions in this case and the associated briefing by the parties, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. Defendants Paul G. Little, John Nicholson, and Karen Jones Edney's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED;
2. Pro se Plaintiff John Stanley's Complaint (ECF No.2) is DISMISSED without prejudice;
3. Stanley's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED; and
4. Stanley's Motion in Support (ECF No. 17) is DISMISSED.
The Court construes this filing, entitled “Motion in Support in Response to Defendants, Paul G. Little, John Nicholson, and Karen Jones-Edney,” as a response in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
It is FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case as closed.