From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Jones

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
21-cv-04495-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-04495-JD

08-11-2021

RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a detainee acting pro se, filed a civil rights action. Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not paid the fee, filed a complete application to proceed IFP or otherwise communicated with the Court. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stanley v. Jones

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
21-cv-04495-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Stanley v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 11, 2021

Citations

21-cv-04495-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)