From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanko v. Rios

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 20, 2009
Civil No. 08-3102 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-3102 (JNE/JJG).

April 20, 2009


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 12, 2009. The magistrate judge recommended that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 Supp. 2008) be denied, that this litigation be dismissed, and that judgment be entered. Petitioner objected. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Docket No. 1] is DENIED.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Stanko v. Rios

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 20, 2009
Civil No. 08-3102 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Stanko v. Rios

Case Details

Full title:Rudy Stanko, Petitioner, v. Ricardo Rios, Michael Nalley, and Harley…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Apr 20, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-3102 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Benson

(Objections, Doc. No. 18, at p. 4.) The Magistrate Judge correctly stated that due process requires that a…

Whentworth v. Fisher

See Kennedy v. Blankenship, 100 F. 3d 640, 643 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that a prisoner does not have a…