From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. Uss-Posco Industries

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-SMS.

January 26, 2011

Mandy L. Jeffcoach, # 232313, McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte Carruth LLP, Fresno, CA, Daniel I. Booker (admitted pro hac vice), Alexander Y. Thomas (admitted pro hac vice), REED SMITH LLP, Falls Church, VA, Attorneys for Defendants, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and PITCAL, INC.

Reginald D. Steer (State Bar No. 56324), AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER, FELD LLP, San Francisco, CA, Steven M. Pesner (admitted pro hac vice), John W. Berry (admitted pro hac vice), AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER, FELD LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendants POSCO, AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION and POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, PITCAL, INC., POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION, POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING THEM TO FILE THEIR JOINT REPLY TO THE OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL


Defendants UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, PITCAL, INC., a Delaware corporation POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a California corporation (collectively "Joint Defendants") will have filed a Joint Motion for Order Allowing Them to File their Joint Reply to the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and Supporting Documents Under Seal.

This Court, having determined that there is good cause to protect the confidentiality of the information contained in the Motion to Dismiss, hereby GRANTS the Motion and directs the Clerk of the Court to file under seal the complete, unredacted version of Joint Defendants' Joint Reply to the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss.

For good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. Within two (2) days of the filing, the defendants shall file a redacted copy of the joint reply. The redactions shall be narrowly-tailored so as to protect only that information which is confidential.

Dated: January 26, 2011


Summaries of

Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. Uss-Posco Industries

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. Uss-Posco Industries

Case Details

Full title:STANISLAUS FOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)