From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanisic v. Stanisic

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 18, 2012
381 P.3d 664 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58921.

09-18-2012

Shandell M. STANISIC, Appellant, v. Alexander I. STANISIC, Respondent.

Shandell Stanisic Sandra A. Unsworth


Shandell Stanisic

Sandra A. Unsworth

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order imposing sanctions for contempt. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Bridget Robb Peck, Judge.

In ruling on a motion to suspend appellant's visitation rights, the district court found appellant to be in contempt of court. Consequently, the district court issued a second order directing appellant to pay respondent's attorney fees and costs as a sanction for appellant's contempt. Appellant appeals from this order, and we dismiss.

This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). No statute or rule authorizes an appeal from an order imposing sanctions for contempt. See NRAP 3A(b) ; Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners, 116 Nev. 646, 649, 5 P.3d 569, 571 (2000) (concluding that this court generally lacks jurisdiction over an appeal from a contempt order). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Stanisic v. Stanisic

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 18, 2012
381 P.3d 664 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Stanisic v. Stanisic

Case Details

Full title:Shandell M. STANISIC, Appellant, v. Alexander I. STANISIC, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 664 (Nev. 2012)