From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanger v. Bohlinger

United States District Court, District of Montana
Apr 20, 2023
No. CV-22-91-GF-BMM (D. Mont. Apr. 20, 2023)

Opinion

CV-22-91-GF-BMM

04-20-2023

HAILEY STANGER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. KIRSTEN BOHLINGER, Defendant.


ORDER

Brian Morris, Chief District Judge

Defendant Kirsten Bohlinger moves the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction subject to Fed. Rule Civ. P. 12(b)(1). (Doc. 20.)

Plaintiffs did not respond to Defendant Bohlinger's Motion by the March 24, 2023 deadline. The Court contacted Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs communicated that they consider the Motion moot and do not intend to respond.

Defendant DOWL, LLC filed previously an Unopposed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, (Doc. 18), which the Court granted on March 20, 2023. (Doc. 19.) The Court dismissed Plaintiffs' claims against DOWL, LLC without prejudice. The Court ruled that all remaining motions are denied as moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Bohlinger's Motion (Doc. 20) is DENIED AS MOOT as this case is closed.


Summaries of

Stanger v. Bohlinger

United States District Court, District of Montana
Apr 20, 2023
No. CV-22-91-GF-BMM (D. Mont. Apr. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Stanger v. Bohlinger

Case Details

Full title:HAILEY STANGER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. KIRSTEN BOHLINGER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Apr 20, 2023

Citations

No. CV-22-91-GF-BMM (D. Mont. Apr. 20, 2023)