From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanford v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 19, 2017
2016-1990 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1990

07-19-2017

SUSAN STANFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

MICHAEL D. SYDOW, SR., The Sydow Firm, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARIANA TERESA ACEVEDO, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00123-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. Braden.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL D. SYDOW, SR., The Sydow Firm, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARIANA TERESA ACEVEDO, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 19, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Stanford v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 19, 2017
2016-1990 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Stanford v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN STANFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 2017

Citations

2016-1990 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2017)