From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanford v. Hardy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 3, 2011
CIV S-10-2675 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011)

Opinion


TERRELL CORDARRYL STANFORD, Plaintiff, v. JIM HARDY, Defendant. No. CIV S-10-2675 GGH P. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 3, 2011.

          FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

         By an order filed October 20, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within twenty-eight days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to assign a district judge to this case.

         These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S. C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Stanford v. Hardy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 3, 2011
CIV S-10-2675 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Stanford v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL CORDARRYL STANFORD, Plaintiff, v. JIM HARDY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 3, 2011

Citations

CIV S-10-2675 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011)