From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanford v. Pa. Parole Bds.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Jun 20, 2016
No. 47 WM 2016 (Pa. Jun. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 47 WM 2016

06-20-2016

ORLANDO STANFORD, Petitioner v. PA. PAROLE BOARDS; DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES LAZAR; WARDEN, GILMORE, SCI-GREENE; WESTMORELAND COUNTY, Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petition for an Instant Hearing, the Application for Leave to File an Answer to the Commonwealth's Answer, and the Application for Leave to File Objection of Right are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Stanford v. Pa. Parole Bds.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Jun 20, 2016
No. 47 WM 2016 (Pa. Jun. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Stanford v. Pa. Parole Bds.

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO STANFORD, Petitioner v. PA. PAROLE BOARDS; DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 20, 2016

Citations

No. 47 WM 2016 (Pa. Jun. 20, 2016)