Stanfill v. Aedec International, Inc.

Full title: RAYMOND D. STANFILL, et al., Plaintiff, v. AEDEC International, Inc., et…

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: May 16, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-255 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-255 (MTT).

May 16, 2011

ORDER

MARC TREADWELL, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (Doc. 48). The Plaintiff seeks relief related to a surveillance video. While the Plaintiff properly raises the issue, the Plaintiff seeks the wrong relief. Based on the current record, it appears likely that the proper issue is one of spoliation of evidence and the appropriate remedies and sanctions for that spoliation.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is denied. The Court will revisit the issue when an appropriate record is before the Court. The Defendant's request for fees and costs is denied.

SO ORDERED.