From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanfield v. Graham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 31, 2018
No. 18-6427 (4th Cir. Jul. 31, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6427

07-31-2018

TAMARA STANFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden; BRADLEY BUTLER, Security Chief; DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; STEVEN BEEMAN, Sergeant; JEFFREY SHIMKO, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees.

Tamara Stanfield, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (8:16-cv-04149-GLR) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tamara Stanfield, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tamara Stanfield appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stanfield v. Graham, No. 8:16-cv-04149-GLR (D. Md. filed Mar. 27, 2018 & entered Mar. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Stanfield v. Graham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 31, 2018
No. 18-6427 (4th Cir. Jul. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Stanfield v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA STANFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 31, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6427 (4th Cir. Jul. 31, 2018)