From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standridge v. Pierce

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 6, 2024
4:24-cv-00334-LPR-BBM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00334-LPR-BBM

11-06-2024

TYLER STANDRIDGE ADC #553489 PLAINTIFF v. PIERCE, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (PRD) from United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore (Doc. 10). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the PRD, along with careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the PRD as its findings and conclusions in all respects.

The Court's agreement with the PRD is for screening purposes only. A strong motion to dismiss might result in a different 12(b)(6) decision with respect to some of the remaining claims.

Accordingly, Plaintiff may proceed with his individual capacity claims against Defendants Warden Pierce, Captain Wade, Major Jimmy Coleman, the Doe classification officer, Doe CO 1, and Doe CO in 14BKs. Plaintiff's official capacity claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Standridge v. Pierce

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 6, 2024
4:24-cv-00334-LPR-BBM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Standridge v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:TYLER STANDRIDGE ADC #553489 PLAINTIFF v. PIERCE, Warden, Cummins Unit…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 6, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00334-LPR-BBM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2024)