From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standards v. Kropke (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2023
215 A.D.3d 1220 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

PM–89–23

04-27-2023

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468–A. Committee on Professional Standards, Now Known as Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; v. Amy Elizabeth Kropke, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3047867)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP, New York City (Luke McGrath of counsel), for respondent.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP, New York City (Luke McGrath of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by January 2014 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1039, 984 N.Y.S.2d 134 [3d Dept. 2014] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to December 13, 2022 and the February 23, 2023 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Freedman] , 166 A.D.3d 1161, 1162, 86 N.Y.S.3d 792 [3d Dept. 2018] ), it is

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Standards v. Kropke (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2023
215 A.D.3d 1220 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Standards v. Kropke (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468–A…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 27, 2023

Citations

215 A.D.3d 1220 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
215 A.D.3d 1220