From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Coleman (In re Coleman)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-11-26

In the Matter of Douglas E. COLEMAN, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Douglas E. Coleman, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner. Douglas E. Coleman, Hudson, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner. Douglas E. Coleman, Hudson, respondent pro se.
Before: McCARTHY, J.P., ROSE, LYNCH and CLARK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2005 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Hudson, Columbia County.

Respondent has failed to comply with a subpoena duces tecum, dated September 4, 2014, which directed him to appear on September 17, 2014 for an examination under oath by petitioner and produce files relevant to a pending complaint against him. Respondent has further failed to reply to petitioner's instant motion seeking to indefinitely suspend him from the practice of law pending his compliance with the subpoena ( see Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept. [22 NYCRR] § 806.4[b] ). Under the circumstances, we grant petitioner's motion and suspend respondent from the practice of law, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, pending his full compliance with the subpoena and until further order of this Court ( see e.g. Matter of Nichols, 116 A.D.3d 1221, 983 N.Y.S.2d 451 [2014]; Matter of McCormick, 75 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 904 N.Y.S.2d 678 [2010]; Matter of Ashe, 300 A.D.2d 737, 738, 751 N.Y.S.2d 624 [2002] ).

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, pending his full compliance with the subpoena duces tecum dated September 4, 2014, and until further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority; or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys ( see Rules of the App.Div., 3d Dept. [22 NYCRR] § 806.9). McCARTHY, J.P., ROSE, LYNCH and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Coleman (In re Coleman)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Coleman (In re Coleman)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Douglas E. COLEMAN, an Attorney. Committee on…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 1233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
122 A.D.3d 1233
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8308

Citing Cases

In re Smith

PER CURIAM.Provie E. Smith was admitted to practice by this Court in 2010 and maintains an office for the…

In re Smith

Provie E. Smith was admitted to practice by this Court in 2010 and maintains an office for the practice of…