From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standard Film Service Co. v. Alexander Film Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

May, 1925.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. In each case: Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an action at law for such damages as may have been sustained.


The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an action at law for such damages as may have been sustained, on the authority of Black v. Vanderbilt ( 70 App. Div. 16); Perrin v. Smith (135 id. 127); Low v. Swartwout (171 id. 725) Gosselin Corp. v. Mario Tapparelli Fu Pietro of America, Inc. (191 id. 580; affd., 229 N.Y. 596), where the second question certified to the Court of Appeals was: "If the complaint herein does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in equity, is the defendant entitled to judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the complaint?" which the Court of Appeals answered in the affirmative.


Summaries of

Standard Film Service Co. v. Alexander Film Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Standard Film Service Co. v. Alexander Film Corp.

Case Details

Full title:STANDARD FILM SERVICE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER FILM CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Boissevain v. Boissevain

As the complaint states no cause of action cognizable in equity and prays for but equitable relief, the…