Opinion
June 23, 1936.
Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.
Isaac Reiss, for the appellants.
A. Arthur Klar of counsel [ Schiff, Dorfman Stein, attorneys], for the respondent.
Present — MARTIN, P.J., McAVOY, UNTERMYER, DORE and COHN, JJ.
We agree with the Special Term that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount expended in collecting the note, including attorney's fees. We are of opinion, however, that it may not recover, in addition to these expenses, a ten per cent collection charge. The ten per cent collection charge in addition to all other expenses which might be incurred in enforcing payment of the note necessarily constituted a forfeiture and not liquidated damages.
The order appealed from in so far as it grants plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.
Order in so far as it grants plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.