From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standard Bank, PLC v. Runge, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM

02-07-2012

STANDARD BANK, PLC, Plaintiff, v. RUNGE, INC., f/k/a RUNGE MINING, INC., and d/b/a PINCOCK, ALLEN & HOLT Defendant.


ORDER ON MOTION TO BIFURCATE ISSUES

On January 20, 2012, the plaintiff Standard Bank and respondent Jones Day filed a motion to bifurcate the issues presented by the defendant's motion for fees and costs. The defendant filed an opposition on January 23, 2012, and the plaintiff filed a reply on January 25, 2012. Upon the understanding that the motion to bifurcate seeks to separate the legal question of entitlement to attorney's fees and costs related to this litigation from the question of amounts to be awarded and that the question of entitlement presents only legal issues which can be resolved without any additional discovery procedures, it is

ORDERED that the motion to bifurcate is granted and the brief due from the plaintiff and respondent on February 14, 2012, will address the legal questions of entitlement to attorney's fees and costs related to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Standard Bank, PLC v. Runge, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Standard Bank, PLC v. Runge, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STANDARD BANK, PLC, Plaintiff, v. RUNGE, INC., f/k/a RUNGE MINING, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)