From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stancu v. Hyatt Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 10, 2021
No. 3:20-cv-864-E-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:20-cv-864-E-BN

02-10-2021

JOHN STANCU, Plaintiff, v. HYATT CORPORATION/HYATT REGENCY DALLAS, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court therefore GRANTS the motions to dismiss filed by Defendant Ray Hunt [Dkt. No. 12] and Defendants Brett Killingsworth, Mark Spinelli, Samuel Molina, and Micha Bell [Dkt. No. 18] insofar as all claims against them should be dismissed because none of these defendants were Plaintiff John Stancu's employers under the applicable statutes; GRANTS Defendant Hyatt Corporation/Hyatt Regency's motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 17] in part by dismissing Stancu's Title VII claims, his ADEA claims, and his ADA claims based on failure to promote and refusal to pay workers' compensation benefits for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and GRANTS Stancu leave to file an amended complaint solely against Hyatt within 21 days.

SO ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2021.

/s/_________

ADA BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stancu v. Hyatt Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 10, 2021
No. 3:20-cv-864-E-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Stancu v. Hyatt Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN STANCU, Plaintiff, v. HYATT CORPORATION/HYATT REGENCY DALLAS, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 10, 2021

Citations

No. 3:20-cv-864-E-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2021)

Citing Cases

McClure-Soto v. Bexar Cnty.

The administrative exhaustion requirement also applies to claims under the ADEA. Stancu v. Hyatt Corp./Hyatt…

Davis v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

A challenge to the plaintiff's failure to timely exhaust ADEA claims is proper in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to…