From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanback v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 17, 2022
1:19CV966 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

1:19CV966 1:16 CR423-1

10-17-2022

CHADNEY DEVERICH STANBACK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

N. CARLTON TILLEY, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) [Doc. #88] and, on September 14, 2022, was served on the parties in this action [Doc. #89]. Petitioner timely filed Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. [Doc. #90.]

The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which objection is made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #80] is GRANTED and that the Section 2255 Motion [Doc. #72] is DISMISSED. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Stanback v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 17, 2022
1:19CV966 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Stanback v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CHADNEY DEVERICH STANBACK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

1:19CV966 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2022)