From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stambler v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

January, 1927.


Judgment of the County Court of Richmond county reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. The presumption arising from the registration of this car, pursuant to section 282 High. of the Highway Law, in the name of Samuel Caven ( McCann v. Davison, 145 App. Div. 522; Ferris v. Sterling, 214 N.Y. 249; Bogorad v. Dix, 176 App. Div. 774) was overcome by the uncontradicted proof that plaintiff purchased this car and was the owner of it at the time of the trial. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Added by Laws of 1910, chap. 374, as amd. by Laws of 1921, chap. 580; Laws of 1924, chap. 360, and Laws of 1925, chaps. 33, 64, 517; since amd. — [REP.


Summaries of

Stambler v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Stambler v. Walsh

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE STAMBLER, Appellant, v. THOMAS J. WALSH, as Receiver of SAMUEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Gerard v. Simpson

The issue of ownership, operation and control of the bus and of the franchise route was a question of fact…