From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stalnaker, et al., v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 3, 1936
171 So. 226 (Fla. 1936)

Opinion

Order entered December 3, 1936.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hamilton County, R.H. Rowe, Judge.

C.A. Avriett and D.M. Martin, for Plaintiffs in Error.

No appearance for the State.


ORDER.


J.T. Hammock, Sr., was tried with Wilson Stalnaker and Nathan Prayther for the murder of W.C. Harris in Hamilton County. Hammock was convicted of murder in the first degree with recommendation to mercy. He has taken writ of error to the judgment of conviction and moves for bail pending the disposition of his case in this Court.

Section 9 of the Bill of Rights provides that all persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great.

This provision of the Constitution has reference to bail sought prior to indictment and trial. After trial and conviction the matter of granting bail, as does a supersedeas, rests in the discretion of the trial court to be determined by the evidence and the facts in the case. Ex parte McDaniel, 86 Fla. 145, 97 So. 317.

The bill of exceptions has been examined and while we here express no opinion as to the probative force of the evidence, we are confident that the circumstances warrant favorable consideration of the application for bail which is hereby granted conditioned on the posting of bond in the sum of $5,000.00 to be approved by the Sheriff of Hamilton County.

It is ordered.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Stalnaker, et al., v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 3, 1936
171 So. 226 (Fla. 1936)
Case details for

Stalnaker, et al., v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILSON STALNAKER, J.T. HAMMOCK, SR., and NATHAN PRAYTHER, v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 3, 1936

Citations

171 So. 226 (Fla. 1936)
171 So. 226

Citing Cases

State v. Flowers

Bail during that interim period is a matter of discretion with the Court. Stalnaker v. State, 126 Fla. 407,…

Rowe v. State

The state argues that under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.691 (1977) the trial court has no discretion to grant bail to a…