From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stallo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 30, 2019
578 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 82099 C/w WD 82100

07-30-2019

Frank J. STALLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

James C. Egan, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


James C. Egan, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Frank J. Stallo appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion which claimed that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate bank transactions that could have been exculpatory. Because trial counsel's performance was not deficient and no prejudice was established in any event, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Stallo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 30, 2019
578 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Stallo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Frank J. STALLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 30, 2019

Citations

578 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)