From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stalling v. Stinson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
2:20-cv-01180-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01180-JAM-JDP (PC)

09-23-2021

MARLOW R. STALLING, Plaintiff, v. A. STINSON, Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 17, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 16, is denied.


Summaries of

Stalling v. Stinson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
2:20-cv-01180-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Stalling v. Stinson

Case Details

Full title:MARLOW R. STALLING, Plaintiff, v. A. STINSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01180-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)