From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stalikas v. United Materials

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 2003
100 N.Y.2d 626 (N.Y. 2003)

Opinion

165

Decided October 23, 2003.

Submitted by Eric M. Shelton, for appellants.

Submitted by Dennis J. Bischof for respondent Deakin.

Submitted by William E. Nitterauer for respondents United Materials, L.L.C. and Pierce.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.


MEMORANDUM:

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In this action seeking damages for injuries plaintiff suffered in a five-car chain reaction accident, the Appellate Division properly determined that any error by Supreme Court in refusing to charge this jury pursuant to PJI3d 2:26 was harmless. Here, the only statute allegedly violated was Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129(a), which requires that drivers "not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent" under the circumstances. The jury found defendants not negligent under a reasonable and prudent standard as charged by Supreme Court (see CPLR 2001; 2002).

Further, sufficient proof was adduced at trial from which a reasonable jury could infer that defendants were not negligent. Because sufficient evidence in the record exists to support the verdict in defendants' favor, the Appellate Division did not err in declining to disturb it.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, orders affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Stalikas v. United Materials

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 2003
100 N.Y.2d 626 (N.Y. 2003)
Case details for

Stalikas v. United Materials

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN STALIKAS, JR. AND HEIDI STALIKAS, Appellants, v. UNITED MATERIALS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 23, 2003

Citations

100 N.Y.2d 626 (N.Y. 2003)
769 N.Y.S.2d 191
801 N.E.2d 411

Citing Cases

Sorensen v. Kakashvili

When a rear end collision occurs, a presumption of negligence is established by proof that a stopped car was…