From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staley v. Honeyman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 5, 1952
104 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio 1952)

Opinion

No. 32696

Decided March 5, 1952.

Descent and distribution — Adopted child — Law governing — Right to inherit from and through adopting parent.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Miami county.

This action to determine heirship was instituted in the Probate Court and presents questions as to what law governs the right of an adopted child to inherit and whether an adopted child has the right to inherit collaterally through as well as from its adopting parent. The court held that an adopted child's rights to inherit are governed by the laws in force at the time of the death of the decedent and not the laws in force at the time of the adoption, and that an adopted child is entitled to inherit collaterally through as well as from its adopting parent.

That judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals and the cause is in this court on the allowance of a motion to certify the record.

Mr. Ellis W. Kerr, for appellant.

Mr. Leo H. Faust, for appellee.


The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Flynn, Admr., v. Bredbeck, 147 Ohio St. 49, 68 N.E.2d 75.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Staley v. Honeyman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 5, 1952
104 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio 1952)
Case details for

Staley v. Honeyman

Case Details

Full title:STALEY, ADMR. v. HONEYMAN ET AL.; HUNT, APPELLANT; FRANTZ, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 5, 1952

Citations

104 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio 1952)
104 N.E.2d 172

Citing Cases

Williams, — Thompson

" The following cases may be added to those set forth above: Gamble v. Cloud, 263 Ala. 336, 82 So.2d 526.…

Ohio Citizens Bank v. Mills

While the general rule, as stated above, is that the law existing at the time an inter vivos trust is…