From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stainbrook v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 26, 2014
6:13-CV-01624-ST (D. Or. Nov. 26, 2014)

Opinion

6:13-CV-01624-ST

11-26-2014

RICHARD A. STAINBROOK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#24) on October 28, 2014, in which she recommends this Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand for an immediate award of benefits. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#24). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the calculation and award of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26th day of November, 2014.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stainbrook v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 26, 2014
6:13-CV-01624-ST (D. Or. Nov. 26, 2014)
Case details for

Stainbrook v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD A. STAINBROOK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

6:13-CV-01624-ST (D. Or. Nov. 26, 2014)