From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staggs v. Doctors Hosp. of Manteca, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-00414-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-00414-MCE-KJN

09-12-2011

LINNIE STAGGS, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF ROBERT E. STAGGS, deceased, and MELISSA STAGGS Plaintiffs v. DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC.; IVAN D. CLAY, Warden; TIM VARGA, Interim Warden; FRANK X CHAVEZ, Warden; SHARON AUNGST; JACL ST. CLAIR, MD.; CURTIS ALLEN, M.D.; EDWIN BANGI, M.D.; JOHN KRPAN, D.O.; JONATHAN BENAK, P.S.; LINCOLN RUSSIN, M.D.; JAMES P. OWEN, M.D.; MARIO P. SATTAH, M.D.; and DOES 1 Through 100, Inclusive Defendants.

DUMMIT, BUCHHOLZ & TRAPP Attorneys At Law Daniela P. Stoutenburg- State Bar No. 183785 Carolyn L. Katzorke - State Bar No. 237989 Attorneys for Defendant DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA


DUMMIT, BUCHHOLZ & TRAPP

Attorneys At Law

Daniela P. Stoutenburg- State Bar No. 183785

Carolyn L. Katzorke - State Bar No. 237989

Attorneys for Defendant DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA

ORDER ON STIPULATION

CLARIFYING PORTIONS OF

PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT

DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA

The stipulation of counsel having been read and considered and good cause appearing, the following is ordered:

1. The first, second, fourth, and fifth claims for relief do not apply to Defendant DHM.

2. Pursuant to C.C.P. §377.34, the Decedent's estate is not entitled to recover damages for pain, suffering, or emotional distress, that Decedent incurred prior to his death against Defendant DHM. These damages do not survive the death of Decedent in the state law negligence claims, and only state law negligence claims are alleged against Defendant DHM in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.

3. Plaintiffs do not seek an award of punitive damages against Defendant DHM in their First Amended Complaint.

4. Plaintiffs do not seek an award of attorneys' fees against Defendant DHM in their First Amended Complaint.

5. This stipulation only applies to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant DHM and is not intended to apply to any of Plaintiffs' claims against other defendants in this action.

6. The parties to this stipulation agree that the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant DHM, presently set for hearing on September 29, 2011, will be vacated upon the entry of this Order.

7. The parties to this stipulation agree that Defendant DHM shall file a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint within 10 days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Staggs v. Doctors Hosp. of Manteca, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-00414-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Staggs v. Doctors Hosp. of Manteca, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LINNIE STAGGS, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF ROBERT E. STAGGS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-00414-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)