From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. Trimble

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 1, 2013
CV 12-1490-GHK (E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013)

Opinion


BRIAN KEITH STAFFORD, Petitioner, v. R.H. TRIMBLE, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 12-1490-GHK (E). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 1, 2013.

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GEORGE H. KING, Chief District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) denying and dismissing Ground Three of the Petition without prejudice to the extent that Ground Three alleges an ex post facto claim; and (2) denying and dismissing with prejudice all other claims in the Petition not previously adjudicated in this Court's "Order Accepting Findings, etc., " filed November 25, 2012.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation herein on Petitioner, and on counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Stafford v. Trimble

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 1, 2013
CV 12-1490-GHK (E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Stafford v. Trimble

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KEITH STAFFORD, Petitioner, v. R.H. TRIMBLE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2013

Citations

CV 12-1490-GHK (E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013)