From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 16, 2007
Civil No. 07-88-HO (D. Or. May. 16, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-88-HO.

May 16, 2007


ORDER


Respondent has filed a "Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative to require more specificity" (#7). Petitioner's Response (#8) provides additional information concerning his claim by way of incorporating pleadings from state court proceedings. However, incorporation by reference is not appropriate.

Accordingly, respondent's motion (#7) is allowed to the extent that within 30 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file an amended pleading that clearly sets forth his claims in this proceeding. Specifically, petitioner should specifically identify the parole board action he challenges and the dates of any state court decisions relative to his appeal of that decision. In addition, petitioner should specifically allege the federal constitutional basis for his challenge to the parole board decision in this court.

An amended scheduling order will be entered after petitioner has filed an amended petition consistent with the directives herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stafford v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 16, 2007
Civil No. 07-88-HO (D. Or. May. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Stafford v. State

Case Details

Full title:NEIL BENNETT STAFFORD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-88-HO (D. Or. May. 16, 2007)