From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 30, 2012
CV-09-363-TUC-DCB (D. Ariz. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CV-09-363-TUC-DCB

10-30-2012

Warren Frank Stafford, Plaintiff, v. Charles Ryan, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on October 9, 2012, recommending that the District Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties on October 9, 2012, notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court.

The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately.

__________________

David C. Bury

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stafford v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 30, 2012
CV-09-363-TUC-DCB (D. Ariz. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Stafford v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Warren Frank Stafford, Plaintiff, v. Charles Ryan, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

CV-09-363-TUC-DCB (D. Ariz. Oct. 30, 2012)