From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. Newsom

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1851
34 N.C. 17 (N.C. 1851)

Opinion

(June Term, 1851.)

Where a judgment has been had in the Superior Court, and on appeal to the Supreme Court the judgment is reversed for error, the whole judgment, as well for the costs as for the other matters, is set aside, and the costs must be taxed by the court below, which finally determines the case.

APPEAL from Manly, J., STANLY Spring Term, 1851.

Strange for plaintiff.

G. C. Mendenhall for defendant.


By the judgment at Fall Term, 1850, of Stanly Superior Court, the clerk was directed to tax costs in respect of no other witnesses except those named. He departed from the order and taxed costs in respect to certain other witnesses for attendance up to the time of the trial in Montgomery, Spring Term, 1849, under the impression that an order made at that term, allowing costs in respect of a larger number of witnesses, was still in force and had the effect of qualifying to some extent the order which formed a part of the judgment under which he was acting.

The judge in the court below adopted this view and refused the motion for a retaxation. In this there is error. The order made in Montgomery was an incident, or rather a part of the judgment, which on appeal was set aside. The question of costs, as well as the rights of the parties, was decided by the judgment in Stanly.

The defendant by his appeal established that the judge who tried the case in Montgomery took an erroneous view of it, and the effect of the venire de novo was not merely to relieve from the direct (18) consequence of the error in its bearing upon the results of the case, but also from its indirect consequence in its influence upon the question of costs.

In other words, the order of the judge who determined the case and who was in no error is decisive as to the question of costs, because it is a part of the judgment. The position that it is to be qualified and restricted, "so as to make the two stand together," by an order of a judge who was in error and whose decision was reversed, is untenable.

The judgment refusing the motion for a retaxation must be reversed and the motion allowed.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.


Summaries of

Stafford v. Newsom

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1851
34 N.C. 17 (N.C. 1851)
Case details for

Stafford v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:ELMSLY STAFFORD v. ALLEN NEWSOM

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1851

Citations

34 N.C. 17 (N.C. 1851)