From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 8, 2011
Civ. No. 09-1449-CL (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 09-1449-CL.

March 8, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#22) is adopted. As identified in the Report and Recommendation, the Commissioner's decision is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8 day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Stafford v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 8, 2011
Civ. No. 09-1449-CL (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Stafford v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN EUGENE STAFFORD Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 8, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 09-1449-CL (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2011)