From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staffney v. Warden

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158473 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)

Opinion

SC: 158473

02-04-2019

HAROLD STAFFNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN REFORMATORY WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

158473 & (27)(32) Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 343796
Ionia CC: 18-033091-AH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to strike pleadings and for appointment of counsel and the motion for bond are DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2019

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Staffney v. Warden

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158473 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Staffney v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD STAFFNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN REFORMATORY WARDEN…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 4, 2019

Citations

SC: 158473 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)