From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stacy v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 6, 2020
No. 3:19-cv-446-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-446-M-BN

01-06-2020

BRETT STACY, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated January 6, 2020, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted and that Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Dkt. No. 50] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2020.

/s/_________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Stacy v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 6, 2020
No. 3:19-cv-446-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Stacy v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:BRETT STACY, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2020

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-446-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020)