From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stachan v. Weber

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 24, 1976
535 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

Nos. 75-1211 and 75-1423.

May 24, 1976.

Duane Beeson (argued), Brundage, Neyhart, Beeson Tayer, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Paul Aaron Harris, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and CURTIS, District Judge.

Honorable Jesse W. Curtis, Senior United States District Judge, Los Angeles, California, sitting by designation.


OPINION


These consolidated appeals are from the granting of preliminary injunctions restraining the appellants from interfering with appellees' attendance at union membership meetings. The appellees are members of the union, in good standing.

The initial portion of the agenda for the union's business meetings includes a joint flag salute and pledge of allegiance. The appellees refused to participate and remained standing silently. The union undertook to bar the appellees from attending the beginning portion of the meeting. When the appellees refused to leave, the union adjourned the meeting. This practice has continued.

The question presented is whether the Bill of Rights provisions of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(1) and 411(a)(2), prevent the union from applying the challenged sanction, and, conversely, whether the appellees have the right to engage in their questioned conduct at a union meeting.

The District Court correctly held that the union cannot exclude appellees from the meeting. The exclusion would clearly violate the equal rights section of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(1). Moreover, the congressional grant of free speech in 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(2) protects the conduct of the appellees, however offensive that conduct may have been to other members of the union. There was no showing that the union as a labor institution would be seriously harmed by the failure of appellees to salute the flag or join in the pledge of allegiance. Thus, the union's restriction on their rights of expression is void. Cf. Salzhandler v. Caputo, 316 F.2d 445 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 946, 84 S.Ct. 344, 11 L.Ed.2d 275 (1963).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stachan v. Weber

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 24, 1976
535 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Stachan v. Weber

Case Details

Full title:JAMES STACHAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THOMAS WEBER ET AL., APPELLEES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 24, 1976

Citations

535 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union

We are unaware of any cases clearly addressing the issue. Stachan v. Weber, 535 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1976),…

Rosario v. Dolgen

However, the availability of alternative modes of punishment, such as fines, which do not impede the rights…