From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 25, 1979
370 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 78-1620.

April 25, 1979.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Sumter County; John W. Booth, Judge.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The only point which merits discussion is the propriety of the appellant's sentence to confinement "at hard labor." To be imprisoned "at hard labor" is improper because no existing state statute provides for its imposition as a sentence for any offense. Speller v. State, 305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Remanded for the purpose of striking the language "at hard labor" from the sentencing order; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 25, 1979
370 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Stacey v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE EUGENE STACEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 25, 1979

Citations

370 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Evans v. State

In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. Stacey v. State, 370 So.2d 75 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Beard v.…