From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stacey v. Daily

United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Jul 22, 2021
6:20-cv-00610 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

6:20-cv-00610

07-22-2021

Benjamin Stacey, Plaintiff, v. Debra Dianna Daily, Defendant.


ORDER

J. Campbell Barker United States District Judge

Plaintiff Benjamin Stacey filed the above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988. Doc. 1. This case was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. Doc. 3.

On January 8, 2021, the magistrate judge instructed plaintiff to show cause for his failure to timely effect service of process. Doc. 4. Plaintiff failed to do so. On January 22, 2021, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that the court dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to timely effect service of process and failure to obey a court order. Doc. 5. No. objections were filed.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely effect service of process and for failure to comply with a court order.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Stacey v. Daily

United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Jul 22, 2021
6:20-cv-00610 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Stacey v. Daily

Case Details

Full title:Benjamin Stacey, Plaintiff, v. Debra Dianna Daily, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

6:20-cv-00610 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2021)