Opinion
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00381-JRG-RSP
08-11-2023
STA GROUP LLC, Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 87), recommending denial of Motorola's Motion to Dismiss. Motorola has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 103), with Plaintiff STA (“STA”) filing a Response (Dkt. No. 113).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Motorola's Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Motorola's Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED.