From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Pierre v. Potash Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 23, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0536-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Dec. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0536-BAJ-SCR

12-23-2011

ROGER JAMES ST. PIERRE, JR. v. POTASH CORPORATION D/B/A PCS NITROGEN FERTILIZER, L.P., ET AL


RULING

The Court having carefully considered the complaint, the motion to remand, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated November 15, 2011 (doc. 9) to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Opposition to Removal Is Denied.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, December 23, 2011.

___________________________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

St. Pierre v. Potash Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 23, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0536-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Dec. 23, 2011)
Case details for

St. Pierre v. Potash Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROGER JAMES ST. PIERRE, JR. v. POTASH CORPORATION D/B/A PCS NITROGEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Dec 23, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0536-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Dec. 23, 2011)