From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Whale

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 8, 1910
108 P. 403 (Okla. 1910)

Opinion

No. 463

Opinion Filed March 8, 1910.

Error from District Court, Bryan County; D. A. Richardson, Judge.

Action by S. A. Whale and the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company of Hartford against the St. Louis San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

R. A. Kleinschmidt and Dech Dech, for plaintiff in error.

Hatchett Ferguson, for defendants in error.


Counsel for both parties in the above-entitled cause have agreed that the judgment rendered therein is supported by the same evidence as that in the case of St. Louis San Francisco Railroad Company v. Shannon (reported in this volume) 108 P. 401; the only difference in the two cases being that in the instant case the cause of action is for hay which was destroyed at the time the barn was burned for which the action above referred to was brought, and it is stipulated that the decision in this case shall follow the decision in the Shannon Case.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Whale

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 8, 1910
108 P. 403 (Okla. 1910)
Case details for

St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Whale

Case Details

Full title:ST. LOUIS S. F. R. CO. v. WHALE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 8, 1910

Citations

108 P. 403 (Okla. 1910)
108 P. 403

Citing Cases

Midland Valley R. Co. v. Barton

There is a marked similarity between the facts involved in the Kansas case and the facts presented herein.…