From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Farm Mutual Auto. v. McCarthy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 8, 1995
664 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-3765.

December 8, 1995.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County; W.O. Beauchamp, Jr., Judge.

G. Michael Burnett and James H. Daniel of Taylor, Day Rio, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Jack M. Ross, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellee.


In Warren v. Travelers Insurance Co., 650 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), we rejected substantially the same argument appellant presents here. Therefore, we affirm on the authority of Warren, and, as we did in Warren, certify the following question of great public importance:

MAY AN INJURED PERSON WHO IS ENTITLED TO RECOVER BODILY INJURY LIABILITY BENEFITS, BUT WHOSE DAMAGES EXCEED THE POLICY LIMIT FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE, ALSO RECOVER UNDER THE SAME POLICY FOR UNINSURED MOTORIST BENEFITS, WHERE THE POLICY EXCLUDES THE INSURED VEHICLE FROM ITS DEFINITION OF "UNINSURED VEHICLE"?

In addition, we certify conflict with Bulone v. United Services Automobile Association, 660 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

JOANOS, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

St. Farm Mutual Auto. v. McCarthy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 8, 1995
664 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

St. Farm Mutual Auto. v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE, APPELLANT, v. DANIEL McCARTHY, JR., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 8, 1995

Citations

664 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. McCarthy

PER CURIAM. We review State Farm Mutual Automobile v. McCarthy, 664 So.2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), in which…