Opinion
No. 89-32
Submitted May 30, 1990 —
Decided July 3, 1990.
Insurance — R.C. 3923.021 — Public hearings on rates — Absent evidence that rates were not calculated in accordance with sound actuarial principles, the Superintendent of Insurance must find that the benefits are not unreasonable in relation to the premium charged and must approve the rate increase.
IN PROHIBITION.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, John C. Elam, Michael J. Canter, Terry M. Miller and James C. Becker, for relator Community Mutual Insurance Co.
Michael Miller, prosecuting attorney, and Harland H. Hale, for respondents Tenth District Court of Appeals, Judge Dean Strausbaugh, Judge Archer E. Reilly, Judge John C. Young; and Judge David Cain, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Marc A. Kleiman, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan Aronoff, James F. DeLeone, Orla E. Collier and Thomas E. Berry, for respondent-intervenor Superintendent of Insurance.
In view of our decision announced today in Community Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fabe (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 187, 556 N.E.2d 1155, this cause is dismissed as moot.
MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT and RESNICK, JJ., concur.
H. BROWN, J., not participating.