From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Clair v. XPO Logistics, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 24, 2023
989 N.W.2d 809 (Mich. 2023)

Opinion

SC: 165210, 165211, COA: 356954, 356968

05-24-2023

Maureen ST. CLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. XPO LOGISTICS, INC., d/b/a UX Assembly and Installation, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee, and ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and CMC Logistics, Inc., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2022 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs in accordance with MCR 7.312(E), addressing: (1) whether the plaintiff's action against defendant CMC Logistics is barred by the statute of limitations, see MCL 600.2957(2) ; MCL 600.5856(a) ; and (2) whether defendant ICON is entitled to the statutory misuse defense, see MCL 600.2947(2). The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for appellant, and 20 minutes for appellees, to be divided at their discretion. MCR 7.314(B)(2).

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

St. Clair v. XPO Logistics, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 24, 2023
989 N.W.2d 809 (Mich. 2023)
Case details for

St. Clair v. XPO Logistics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Maureen ST. CLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. XPO LOGISTICS, INC., d/b/a UX…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 24, 2023

Citations

989 N.W.2d 809 (Mich. 2023)