From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Clair v. Estrada

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Jan 11, 2008
Case No. 4:08cv12-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 4:08cv12-RH/WCS.

January 11, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. 2, and a supporting affidavit, doc. 3. Plaintiff resides in the State of Virginia, and the named Defendant is a state judge in Sebring, Florida. Doc. 1. Sebring is in Highlands County, Florida, which is not within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court; rather, Highlands County is located within the Southern District of Florida. Thus, the proper forum for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 89(c) is in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Ft. Pierce Division.

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a case to another district or division "in which it could have been brought." The Court may also raise the issue of defective venue sua sponte. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988) (stating "a district court may raise on its own motion an issue of defective venue or lack of personal jurisdiction; but the court may not dismiss without first giving the parties an opportunity to present their views on the issue.")

In light of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Ft. Pierce Division, for all further proceedings including a ruling on the in forma pauperis motion.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

St. Clair v. Estrada

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Jan 11, 2008
Case No. 4:08cv12-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2008)
Case details for

St. Clair v. Estrada

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DANIEL ST. CLAIR, JR., Plaintiff, v. JUDGE PETER ESTRADA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Jan 11, 2008

Citations

Case No. 4:08cv12-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2008)