From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Amant v. Dabedie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-00446-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 17, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-00446-BAJ-SCR

11-17-2014

ST. AMANT v. DABEDIE, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

On August 1, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff Jessie St. Amant's Complaint (Doc. 1) be dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Doc. 8). Plaintiff filed a timely objection to the report and recommendation on August 8, 2014. (Doc. 9).

Plaintiff's objection merely reiterates his claims challenging the existence of probable cause at the time of his arrest and the calculation of good time credits. To the extent that he cites case law in support of his objections, the case law is unavailing. Under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), Plaintiff must prove that his conviction was reversed, expunged, declared invalid, or called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to recover damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. at 486-87. In addition, with respect to Plaintiff's challenge regarding the calculation of his good time credits, as articulated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, § 1983 is not the appropriate statute under which to seek relief when challenging the fact or duration of one's confinement. (See Doc. 8 at p. 5).

Having carefully considered the Plaintiff's Complaint and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter be DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to seek federal habeas corpus relief regarding his claims alleging denial of good time credits. (Doc. 8).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 17th day of November, 2014.

/s/_________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

St. Amant v. Dabedie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-00446-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 17, 2014)
Case details for

St. Amant v. Dabedie

Case Details

Full title:ST. AMANT v. DABEDIE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 17, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-00446-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 17, 2014)