Opinion
NO. 03-12-00099-CV
07-11-2012
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-11-003234, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Appellants have filed a motion to unseal the administrative record in this matter. They assert in their motion that the trial court's sealing order only sealed a document they refer to as "Plaintiff's Exhibit 1." The trial court's order, however, states that "exhibits included in the Administrative Record, filed as Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 on February 1, 2012, shall be filed and placed under seal." While the order is not entirely clear, we understand it to mean that the trial court ordered the entire administrative record, which was admitted as exhibit 1 in the suit for judicial review, sealed. Moreover, we are unable to discern what document appellants consider to be "Plaintiff's Exhibit 1." We therefore deny the motion to unseal the record. The attorneys for the parties may, however, review the administrative record in the clerk's office, but may not copy or check it out. Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin