From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 10, 2002
816 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D01-2190.

May 10, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Daniel P. Dawson, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tammy L. Jaques, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


This juvenile waived his right to counsel and pled guilty to the charge. After sentencing, he appealed claiming the record does not reflect that his rights of counsel were explained to him prior to waiver. Because the recording device failed, this record is not complete.

The State concedes that the record must establish a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to counsel and further concedes that "it is impossible to determine the knowing and voluntary nature of his waiver from the face of the record." We reverse for further proceedings. See E.C.H. v. State, 751 So.2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

S.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 10, 2002
816 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

S.S. v. State

Case Details

Full title:S.S., O/B/O T.S., A CHILD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 10, 2002

Citations

816 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)