From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sroka v. Sroka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1998
255 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 13, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Equitable Distribution.

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in confirming the Referee's report and directing her, upon the Referee's recommendation, to pay $14,000 to defendant. However, plaintiff did not challenge the Referee's report and recommendation by making a motion to reject the report pursuant to CPLR 4403. That section affords the parties "the opportunity 'of pointing out in what respects, if any, the Referee's report or his conduct of the proceedings is erroneous'" before the court takes action on it ( Matter of Breland [MVAIC], 24 A.D.2d 881, quoting Rosenfield v. Rosenfield, 272 App. Div. 547, 549). By thus failing to alert the court to the alleged errors in the Referee's report, plaintiff waived her present objections to it ( see, Matter of Galiber v. Previte, 40 N.Y.2d 822, 824; Berkowitz v. Halberstam, 151 A.D.2d 535, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 616).


Summaries of

Sroka v. Sroka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1998
255 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Sroka v. Sroka

Case Details

Full title:JOANN SROKA, Appellant, v. EUGENE SROKA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 180

Citing Cases

O'Donnell v. O'Donnell

On appeal, however, the defendant raises these issues in the context of numerous objections to the referee's…

Nationstar Mortg. v. O'Brien

Contrary to plaintiff's contention, defendant's opposition to plaintiff's motion "alert[ed] the court to the…